For the separation of peptides with gradient-elution liquid chromatography a poly(butylmethacrylate-
coethylene
dimethacrylate) (BMA) monolithic capillary column was prepared and tested. The conditional
peak capacity was used as a metric for the performance of this column, which was compared with a
capillary column packed with C18-modified silica particles. The retention of the peptides was found to
be smaller on the BMA column than on the particulate C18 column. To obtain the same retention in
isocratic elution an approximately 15% (v/v) lower acetonitrile concentration had to be used in the mobile
phase. The retention window in gradient elution was correspondingly smaller with the BMA column.
The relation between peak width and retention under gradient conditions was studied in detail. It was
found that in shallow gradients, with gradient times of 30 min and more, the peak widths of the least
retained compounds are strongly increased with the BMA column. This was attributed to the fact that
these compounds migrate and elute with an unfavorable high retention factor. More retained compounds
are eluted later in the gradient, but with a lower effective retention factor. With shallow gradients the
peak capacity of the BMA column (
≈90) was clearly lower than that of a conventional packed column
(
≈150). On the other hand, with steep gradients, when components elute with a low effective retention
factor, the performance of the BMA column is relatively good. With a gradient time of 15 min similar peak
widths and thus similar peak capacities (
≈75)were found for the packed and the monolithic column. Two
strategies were investigated to obtain higher peak capacities with methacrylate monolithic columns. The
use of lauryl methacrylate (LMA) instead of butyl methacrylate (BMA) gave an increase in retention and
narrower peaks for early eluting peptides. The peak capacity of the LMA column was
≈125 in a 60min
gradient. Another approach was to use a longer BMA column which resulted in a peak capacity of
≈135
could be obtained in 60 min.
Journal of Chromatography A, 1208 (2008) 109–115